|
Once
upon a time in Cherokee society, the supreme family bond was that of the matriarchal
clan. A Cherokee was born into his or her mother's clan. This concept formed
the basis for all Cherokee family relationships. It was all that mattered, in
a genealogy sense, so there was really no need for genealogy.
Then
one day new neighbors settled nearby and these neighbors, mostly Anglo-Saxon
and some French, brought with them the concept of family history. For these
European immigrants genealogy was a very important part of their culture, government,
and economy. In these cultures, monarchs relied on genealogy to prove their
claim to the throne, first born sons inherited the family farm, and a person's
class was determined before he or she was even born. It's easy to see why early
Cherokee genealogy records were actually kept by and for the neighboring white
communities.
A
few Cherokee who had close ties with the neighboring communities, like the Emperor
Moytoy, Principal Chief Old Hop, and the Ghigua Nancy Ward, made brief appearances
in colonial documents and histories. And some, like Attakullakulla in 1730 and
Ostenaco in 1762, traveled to England to meet the King and made lasting appearances
in English portraiture.
It
wasn't until the early 19th century, however, that we witnessed documentation
on a large scale. It was then that the American settlers began to purchase land
from the Cherokee. With these land sales came the first rolls. The rolls were
not proper genealogy records -- that was not their purpose -- but were legal
contracts between the Cherokee and the US government. They were, basically,
detailed sales receipts for the purchase of land.
In
1817 the Cherokee entered into a treaty with the US government and ceded a tract
of land. Those Cherokees displaced by the sale of this land were given two choices,
resettle on a reservation tract of 640 acres east of the Mississippi (with the
understanding that the land's ownership would revert to the state upon the death
of the owner), or emigrate to the Arkansas territory on a tract of land set
aside by the US government as "Indian Territory." Thus the first Cherokee rolls
were taken as a method of documentation for the dispersal of land. The Emigration
and Reservation Rolls of 1817 noted the names of the head of household
and made reference to whether the family remained on the reservation land or
emigrated west.
There are no individuals with the surname Washington
listed on the Reservation Roll (1817).
There are no individuals with the surname Washington
listed on the Emigration Roll (1817).
By the 1830s, however, the vast majority of
Cherokees still lived within the boundaries of the Cherokee Nation, a tract
of land that encompassed parts of present-day Georgia, North Carolina, Tennessee,
and Alabama. Unfortunately for the Cherokee, this region was on the frontline
of westward settlement expansion, and when gold was discovered beneath their
feet, the pressure on Cherokee sovereignty grew ever stronger. For years US
settlers and lawmakers debated the question of whether the US government had
control over the Cherokee Nation lands. Legally, the Cherokee Nation was to
be treated as a separate and wholly-sovereign foreign nation. But this was not
the reality, and the boundaries of the nations became further muddied as US
citizens continued to push west and settle on lands within the boundaries of
the Cherokee Nation.
In the 1820s and 1830s, a jurisdictional conflict
between the state of Georgia and the Cherokee Nation, became a federal concern
and eventually an historical tragedy. The issue arose when Georgia extended
its state law to include the Cherokee Nation -- thus declaring the Cherokee
laws and government null and void. The Cherokee, however, did not recognize
this governing authority and passed their own written constitution asserting
their own rights and claim to the territory. Georgia in turn declared this Constitution
void.
In 1832, the Cherokee Nation took its case to
the Supreme Court who ruled in its favor in the case of Worcester vs. Georgia.
The ruling asserted that the state of Georgia did not have authority over the
Cherokee Nation and that in fact the Cherokee Nation was a "distinct community,
occupying its own territory ... in which the laws of Georgia can have no force,
and which the citizens of Georgia have no right to enter but with the assent
of the Cherokees themselves or in conformity with treaties and with the acts
of Congress." Georgia refused to acknowledge the Supreme Court ruling, and the
state had the full support of then President Andrew Jackson, who refused to
enforce the ruling.
Simultaneously, in 1830, President Jackson pushed
the Indian Removal Act through Congress. This Act passed with little resistance
in Washington and gave the president the authority to negotiate treaties with
Indian Nations for their removal from Indian lands east of the Mississippi river.
The treaties would move Indians to a designated "Indian Territory" located in
present-day Oklahoma. If Indians refused to move they would become citizens
of the encompassing state and lose all connection to the sovereign Indian nation.
The Cherokee Nation, despite these legal set-backs
and the flood of squatters who continued to settle on their lands unabated,
would not be moved. They had made it illegal, under the Constitution of the
Cherokee Nation, for any Cherokee to sell Cherokee land without express consent
of the tribe. Under the leadership of Principal Chief John Ross, the tribe resisted
removal and held on to what little sovereignty remained. This policy, though
popular, was not universally supported within the tribe. There was a small group
of Cherokees who regarded removal as inevitable and wished to enter into a removal
treaty with the US government. On December 29, 1835, the Treaty Party met secretly
to sign the Treaty of New Echota, which effectively sold the Cherokee land to
the US government.
The Cherokee Nation as a governing entity did
not recognize this treaty, and Chief Ross organized petitions of protest against
the Treaty. The US government did, however, recognize the treaty and ratified
it in 1836. The removal date was set for 1838, and any Cherokees who had not
voluntarily vacated the Cherokee lands by then were to be forcibly removed.
In 1835
the Henderson Roll (sometimes referred to as the "Removal Roll") counted
over 16,000 Cherokees who were to be removed from the land pursuant to the terms
of the Treaty of New Echota. The roll lists the head of household and the state
where the family resided (Alabama, Georgia, Tennessee, or North Carolina).
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Henderson Roll (1835).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
State |
| Washington |
|
Georgia |
With the signing of the Treaty of New Echota
in 1835 came a steady stream of westward Cherokee migration. Many Cherokees,
including the members of the Treaty Party, moved to the designated Cherokee
lands within Indian Territory, but some Cherokee moved elsewhere -- settling
in Arkansas, Missouri, and Texas. In May 1838 those Cherokees who had remained
on their land were roused from their homes, corralled into stockades, and made
to walk to Indian Territory. This tragic episode in Native American history
is called the Trail Where They Cried, or the Trail of Tears, and thousands of
lives were lost.
By
1839 the Trail of Tears had ended and the Cherokee Nation, as a governing body,
was located in Indian Territory. The Cherokee who arrived on the Trail of Tears
were joining those Cherokee who had already settled in Indian Territory prior
to removal -- roughly one-third of the tribe. The two groups worked together
to rebuild their community with the establishment of a constitution in 1839;
a courthouse and schools soon followed. Those Cherokee who had settled in Indian
Territory prior to removal came to be known as the "Old Settlers" and in 1851
the Old Settlers Roll was taken to document those Old Settlers who were
still living.
There are no individuals with the surname Washington
listed on the Old Settlers Roll (1851).
In the
next year, 1852, a census roll was taken of the surviving Cherokee who had been
new arrivals to Indian Territory in 1838-1839 with the Trail of Tears. This
roll was called the Drennen Roll.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Drennen Roll (1852).
| Last
Name |
Page
Number |
| Washington |
231 |
The turn
of the 20th century brought a new push from the US. The tide of westward expansion
had once again made its way to the doorstep of the Cherokee Nation. "Intruders"
had been moving onto Cherokee land for some time, and now it seemed that a new
generation of settlers and entrepreneurs was poised at the edge of Cherokee
lands, coveting and quietly invading the area. With the US government turning
a blind eye, the Cherokee were left to defend their sovereignty and the right
to control their own borders, but were ultimately left with little recourse
for removing squatters.
At the root of this cultural clash was a fundamental
ideological difference regarding land usage. The US was founded on the principle
of private land ownership, a stark contrast to the largely communal social organization
of the Cherokees. The Cherokee Nation fought to maintain its own land usage
policies, in spite of repeated attempts by the US government to encourage parsing
the land for individual ownership. Eventually the pressure became too great
and the Cherokee Nation again experienced a devastating blow to their culture
and community.
In 1893 the Dawes Commission, led by Senator
Henry L. Dawes, was formed to negotiate the final dissolution of the Cherokee
Nation and the allotment of land to its citizens. After much debate the Cherokee
eventually agreed to allotment. In theory, every eligible Cherokee living within
the boundaries of the Cherokee Nation would be allotted 110 acres of "average
grade land." Then, once enrollment and final counts were confirmed, the Cherokee
Nation would be forever dissolved, and the Cherokee people would become residents
of the Oklahoma Territory (the state of Oklahoma as of 1907) and citizens of
the US. However, this allotment was most beneficial to the US because even with
every eligible Cherokee receiving an allotment, it still freed vast tracts of
land not allotted, which could be made available for white settlement.
To compound this unfortunate tragedy, the roll
did not count every eligible Cherokee. Many Cherokee made the decision not to
enroll in this latest in a series of broken treaties and agreements. In particular,
the majority of Nighthawk Keetoowahs, a very traditional group of Cherokees,
refused to sign the roll. In addition, some Cherokee were discouraged or disallowed
to enroll. As a final insult, the enrollment offices were flooded with a glut
of non-Cherokees looking for free land. There were an estimated 100,000 Cherokees
eligible for enrollment, but the enrollment offices were overwhelmed with a
whopping 300,000 applications. Of this, the final Dawes Roll included
roughly 6,600 full-bloods, 30,000 mixed-bloods, 300 intermarried whites, and
5,000 freedmen (former slaves).
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Dawes Roll (1896-1914).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Age
(approx.) |
Blood
Quantum |
Roll
Number |
| Washington |
Albert |
12 |
3/4 |
30912 |
| Washington |
Annie |
11 |
4/4 |
8455 |
| Washington |
Bertha |
1 |
4/4 |
4035 |
| Washington |
Bettie |
4 |
1/2 |
30075 |
| Washington |
Blue |
10 |
4/4 |
21155 |
| Washington |
Charley
L |
15 |
1/32 |
15237 |
| Washington |
Cherokee |
4 |
4/4 |
21157 |
| Washington |
Christopher |
2 |
4/4 |
8454
M |
| Washington |
Clifford |
1 |
4/4 |
8454
M |
| Washington |
Cyrus |
38 |
1/4 |
188
D |
| Washington |
Edson |
45 |
4/4 |
21
D |
| Washington |
Edward
T |
13 |
1/32 |
15238 |
| Washington |
Elizabeth |
33 |
1/16 |
15235 |
| Washington |
Emmett
L |
2 |
1/2 |
30076 |
| Washington |
Ethel
W |
6 |
1/8 |
32115 |
| Washington |
Freddie |
1 |
7/8 |
31320
M |
| Washington |
George |
12 |
4/4 |
31025 |
| Washington |
George |
53 |
4/4 |
115
D |
| Washington |
George |
48 |
4/4 |
8453 |
| Washington |
George |
23 |
4/4 |
19516 |
| Washington |
George |
41 |
4/4 |
4029 |
| Washington |
George |
50 |
4/4 |
21151 |
| Washington |
George
M |
21 |
1/16 |
31652 |
| Washington |
Georgia
Ann |
42 |
4/4 |
4030 |
| Washington |
Gertrude |
2 |
1/8 |
32117 |
| Washington |
Hannah
S |
4 |
1/8 |
32116 |
| Washington |
James |
36 |
3/4 |
1
D |
| Washington |
James |
8 |
4/4 |
21156 |
| Washington |
Joe |
21 |
3/4 |
31226 |
| Washington |
John |
30 |
1/2 |
30072 |
| Washington |
John |
1 |
1/2 |
30076
M |
| Washington |
John
W |
14 |
1/8 |
32113 |
| Washington |
Lewis |
8 |
4/4 |
8456 |
| Washington |
Lizzie |
37 |
4/4 |
21152 |
| Washington |
Louis |
8 |
1/8 |
32114 |
| Washington |
Luke |
13 |
4/4 |
4033 |
| Washington |
Martha
Axe |
1 |
1/2 |
17795 |
| Washington |
Mary |
51 |
4/4 |
116
D |
| Washington |
Mary |
25 |
1/2 |
30073 |
| Washington |
Mary
E |
8 |
1/32 |
15239 |
| Washington |
Mrs
Thomas |
102 |
4/4 |
66
D |
| Washington |
Nancy |
22 |
4/4 |
4031 |
| Washington |
Noley |
3 |
1/8 |
188
D |
| Washington |
Oaley |
3 |
1/8 |
188
D |
| Washington |
Peggy |
18 |
4/4 |
21153 |
| Washington |
Rachel |
1 |
1/2 |
17794
M |
| Washington |
Red |
13 |
4/4 |
21154 |
| Washington |
Robert |
8 |
1/2 |
30074 |
| Washington |
Rosa |
20 |
4/4 |
17794 |
| Washington |
Rosa |
24 |
4/4 |
10284 |
| Washington |
Rufus |
3 |
4/4 |
4034 |
| Washington |
Sallie
M |
16 |
1/32 |
15236 |
| Washington |
Saphronia |
23 |
4/4 |
8454 |
| Washington |
Susan |
18 |
4/4 |
4032 |
| Washington |
Vauda |
13 |
1/32 |
29188 |
| Washington |
William |
51 |
4/4 |
77
D |
| Washington |
William |
1 |
4/4 |
29134
M |
| Washington |
William |
3 |
1/2 |
30076
M |
Note: The Dawes Roll is the basis for citizenship
in the Cherokee Nation. Read more
about applying for citizenship in the Cherokee Nation.
In 1907, the Oklahoma territory became a state
and it seemed the Cherokee Nation was history. But not so -- in 1975 the Cherokee
Nation was reformed under a new Constitution and regained federal recognition
as a tribe. To determine enrollment eligibility in the newly formed Cherokee
Nation, the tribe turned to the Dawes Roll as the final record of Cherokee Nation
citizens. Today, citizenship in the Cherokee Nation is based solely on legally-proven
direct descent from a signer of the Dawes Roll. Since 1975, the Cherokee Nation
population has swelled to over 200,000 members and is one of the largest Indian
nations in the US.
The Cherokee Nation, however, is not the only
federally-recognized Cherokee tribe today. The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
is a smaller nation in North Carolina with an entirely different historical
experience and its own set of rolls.
In 1838, when the Cherokee Nation was moved
to Indian Territory, there were over 1,000 Cherokees who avoided removal. Many
of these Cherokees managed to escape removal by hiding in the Appalachian Mountains,
while others were able to escape the removal through legal channels. Surviving
signers of the 1817 Reservation Roll were technically US citizens, not Cherokee
Nation citizens, and were thus able to avoid removal.
The North Carolina
Cherokee occupied a precarious position for many years as federal agents searched
the area for more Cherokee to remove to Indian Territory. It wasn't until 1848
that the US government agreed to recognize North Carolina Cherokees, provided
the state of North Carolina would likewise grant them permanent residency. The
Mullay Roll lists the 1,500+ Cherokees who remained in North Carolina
after removal.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Mullay Roll (1848).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Mullay
R |
| Washington |
|
176 |
| Washington |
Fodda |
177 |
| Washington |
George |
179 |
| Washington |
(Old
Charleys Son) |
477 |
| Washington |
Qrh
tu eh |
478 |
| Washington |
Wah
lin nee |
178 |
In 1850
an Act of Congress declared that the North Carolina Cherokee were entitled to
a per capita payment based on the terms of the Treaty of New Echota. The Siler
Roll of 1851 listed around 1,700 Eastern Cherokee entitled to this payment.
This was followed by the Chapman Roll in 1852, which listed all Eastern
Cherokee who had actually received these payments. Then in 1854, Congress acted
again when they added 88 names to the original Siler Roll in the aptly named
Act of Congress Roll.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Siler Roll (1851).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Siler
Number |
| Washington |
|
585 |
| Washington |
Ah
lin nih |
589 |
| Washington |
Co
loo hin nih |
587 |
| Washington |
Oo
ti ih |
586 |
| Washington |
Qua
kih |
588 |
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Chapman Roll (1852).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Chapman
Number |
| Washington |
|
906 |
| Washington |
|
887 |
| Washington |
|
585 |
There are no individuals with the surname Washington
listed on the Act of Congress Roll (1854).
By 1866 North
Carolina finally recognized the Eastern Cherokee, and in 1868 a new Act of Congress
called for a new census of the Cherokee in North Carolina. The Swetland Roll
of 1869 listed those Cherokee (and their descendants) on the earlier Mullay
Roll who still remained in North Carolina. With the issues of legal status in
the state of North Carolina now resolved the Eastern Cherokee could again operate
as a tribe, electing a principal chief in 1870 and establishing the Qualla Boundary
as the Eastern Cherokee reservation.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Swetland Roll (1869).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Swetland
Number |
| Washington |
Ah
lik stah nik |
501 |
| Washington |
Co
ha nih |
496 |
| Washington |
Oo
ti yeh |
495 |
| Washington |
Qua
kih |
497 |
| Washington |
Qua
ti ih |
500 |
| Washington |
Stugusta |
498 |
| Washington |
Wal
lus sah |
499 |
| Washington |
Was
se te nah |
494 |
The Hester
Roll, the fifth census of the Eastern Cherokee, was compiled in 1883. The
roll is an extensive audit of the Eastern Cherokee, including nearly 3,000 Cherokees.
It lists all of the Eastern Cherokee listed in the four previous rolls, with
their whereabouts noted (e.g. whether they've dead, if they've moved, or whether
they remain a member of the Eastern Cherokee). This roll includes Eastern Cherokee
living in California, New Jersey, and many places in between. Soon after in
1889, the Eastern Cherokee were incorporated and title to the Qualla Boundary
was transferred from government trust to ownership by the corporation.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Hester Roll (1883).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Hester
Number |
| Washington |
Old
Charley |
423 |
Later in
1908, the Churchill Roll was administered to certify members of the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Churchill Roll (1908).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Churchill
Number |
| Washington |
Annie |
282 |
| Washington |
Elizabeth |
277 |
| Washington |
Elsie |
562 |
| Washington |
George |
283 |
| Washington |
George |
560 |
| Washington |
Henson |
565 |
| Washington |
Jesse |
279 |
| Washington |
Joseph
C |
278 |
| Washington |
Luzene |
563 |
| Washington |
Mindy |
567 |
| Washington |
Morgan |
566 |
| Washington |
Nancy |
215 |
| Washington |
Ollie |
280 |
| Washington |
Polly |
561 |
| Washington |
Rachel |
281 |
| Washington |
Rachel |
564 |
| Washington |
Ray |
216 |
In 1924, when
all American Indians were granted US citizenship, the US Government took the
Baker Roll of the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. This roll, like the
Dawes Roll in the west, was intended to be the final roll of the Eastern Cherokee.
The plan was to allot the land, just as they had done in Oklahoma, but the Eastern
Cherokee managed to avoid this fate and maintain their tribal status.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Baker Roll (1924).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Age
(approx.) |
Blood
Quantum |
Roll
Number |
| Washington |
Elizabeth |
77 |
4/4 |
2887 |
| Washington |
Emma |
22 |
15/16 |
2890 |
| Washington |
Erma
Lillian |
10 |
3/4 |
2897 |
| Washington |
George |
20 |
15/16 |
2891 |
| Washington |
Jesse |
53 |
4/4 |
2888 |
| Washington |
Jonas |
17 |
15/16 |
2892 |
| Washington |
Joseph |
44 |
4/4 |
2893 |
| Washington |
Josephine
Lucile |
13 |
3/4 |
2896 |
| Washington |
Key |
72 |
4/4 |
2898 |
| Washington |
Ollie |
50 |
7/8 |
2889 |
| Washington |
Richard
B. |
16 |
3/4 |
2895 |
| Washington |
Stella
Blythe |
42 |
1/2 |
2894 |
Note: The Baker Roll is the basis for citizenship
in the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians. Read
more about applying for citizenship in the Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians.
Today, the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians
counts over 12,500 members, with more than half living on Cherokee lands which
encompass over 56,000 acres in western North Carolina and eastern Tennessee.
The land is now individually owned, but the titles can only transfer to other
tribal members. Enrollment in the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians requires
an Eastern Cherokee blood quantum of 1/16th or greater and a direct lineal ancestor
on the Baker Roll.
In addition to the
Cherokee rolls specific to each of the two main Cherokee groups, there was one
roll which existed outside of any specific boundary. The Guion Miller Roll
of 1909 came about as the result of a lawsuit won by the Eastern Cherokee. It
was a roll taken to document monetary reparations for broken treaties. In order
to be entitled to payment a person had to be an Eastern Cherokee or a descendant
of an Eastern Cherokee at the time of the treaty violations. As a result, this
roll included both Eastern Cherokee and those living in the Cherokee Nation,
Indian Territory.
The following results include all individuals with the
surname Washington listed on the Guion Miller Roll (1909).
| Last
Name |
First
Name |
Roll
Number |
Region |
| Washington |
Betsy |
28340 |
Western |
| Washington |
Bettie |
28351 |
Western |
| Washington |
Blue |
28344 |
Western |
| Washington |
Emma |
2882 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Emmett |
28352 |
Western |
| Washington |
George |
28341 |
Western |
| Washington |
Jennie |
28347 |
Western |
| Washington |
Jesse |
2877 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
John |
28354 |
Western |
| Washington |
John |
28349 |
Western |
| Washington |
Joseph |
2883 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Key |
2884 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Leach |
28345 |
Western |
| Washington |
Lizzie |
28356 |
Western |
| Washington |
Lizzie |
28355 |
Western |
| Washington |
Lizzie |
28342 |
Western |
| Washington |
Lizzie |
2885 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Luzene |
2880 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Mary |
28350 |
Western |
| Washington |
Neque |
28346 |
Western |
| Washington |
Ollie
Ann |
2878 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Peggy |
28357 |
Western |
| Washington |
Rachel |
2881 |
Eastern |
| Washington |
Red |
28343 |
Western |
| Washington |
Taylor |
27794 |
Western |
| Washington |
Vauda
L |
28358 |
Western |
| Washington |
William |
28353 |
Western |
| Washington |
William |
28348 |
Western |
Note: The "region" field indicates if the individual
resided with the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians (Eastern) or with the
Cherokee Nation (Western) in 1909.
Now, that we've explored the Cherokee rolls,
it's time to trace our own family history to these documents. But, this is often
the most difficult part, because when it comes to "proof" in genealogy there
is only one set of resources we can rely on -- primary-source documents.
Primary-source documents, if you're wondering,
are legally recognized government records. There are nine types of primary-source
documents: birth, death, marriage, census, probate, land, military, church,
and court records. When tracing your genealogy, always try to use primary sources.
Family stories and query boards on the internet are not considered primary sources,
so you'll need to use primary-source documents to back up any information you've
received to this point. Bible records, obituaries, newspaper clippings, published
family histories, county histories, personal papers, and tombstone inscriptions
are considered secondary sources, which can be very helpful as supporting information,
but cannot provide "proof."
Of the various
forms of primary-source documents, census records are particularly helpful.
They offer vital statistics and help to paint a picture of a day-in-the-life
of our ancestors. The records include very basic data, such as name, age, gender,
and race, but also delve into much greater detail. For example, did you know
that the 1910 census notes whether an individual was a Civil War veteran? Genealogy
gold!
What's most exciting about the census is that
it captures information on an individual's entire household. Often, in addition
to information about your specific ancestor, you will find information about
that person's parents, siblings, spouse, and/or children. This peripheral information
can help you advance to the next branch in your family tree. When looking at
census data, consider the following:
- If
your ancestor was an adult in the census you are looking at and is listed
with his/her children, check the children's names, against your existing family
knowledge. If you recognize the children's names and the ages match, then
you've likely found a match. If your ancestor has a common name, like John
Smith, then this kind of matching is vital to finding the right John Smith.
If the children's names don't look familiar, perhaps you're looking at the
record of an unrelated person with the same name.
- The
same can be said if you find your ancestor listed with a spouse. Compare any
data found in the census record with existing family knowledge to be sure
you're looking at the right person. If you didn't know the spouse's name before,
then eureka -- you've just found another ancestor and an entirely new branch
of the family tree to climb!
- If
your ancestor was a child in the census you are looking at and is listed with
his or her parents, then hooray -- you've just climbed to a higher branch
of your family tree!
Don't
stop there -- the census records are good resources for generation jumping.
If your ancestor is listed as an adult on one census, then try to find him or
her listed as a child in an older census. If you find your ancestor listed with
parents, trace the parents back to the prior censuses to find their parents.
This process of cross-referencing is fairly straightforward with male ancestors,
but not so easy with female ancestors and their ever-changing last names. With
female ancestors you may need to consult other records (such as marriage or
church documents) to find maiden names.
You
can search the Federal Census Records online at Ancestry.com.
The subscription service offers access to more than 3,500 databases and
over 2 billion names. Ancestry provides free access to the 1880 Federal
Census records as well as a free 14-day trial offer. You can also find census
records in the local history or genealogy section of many public libraries.
When it comes to the census records, however,
there is a downside. First, the census records are not always accurate. Census-taking
was once conducted through door-to-door interviews, so mistakes were bound to
happen. Therefore, it's important to corroborate census data with other sources,
including: multiple census records, birth and death records, Indian rolls, immigration
and military records, family records and stories, etc. Also, there are some
gaps in the federal census records. For example, the 1890 census was destroyed
by fire in 1921. Of the some 63 million records taken, a whopping 6,160 remain
-- fragments from Alabama, the District of Columbia, Georgia, Illinois, Minnesota,
New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, South Dakota, and Texas. Additionally,
the census records are only available up to 1930. In the interest of our privacy,
the federal government does not release census records to the public for 72
years. So the 1940 census will not be available for research until 2012.
Lastly, and most importantly in the context
of this report, census records only counted those individuals who were citizens
of the United States and eligible for congressional representation, which means
that Cherokees who lived in Indian Territory were not included on the federal
census records until 1900.
Throughout
the second half of the 19th century a handful of census records were taken within
Indian Territory. However, these are not your ordinary census records. In 1860
the Cherokee Nation, Indian Territory, was still considered separate from the
US, and citizens of the Cherokee Nation were not citizens of the US and could
not be counted toward congressional representation. However, non-Indian residents
of Indian Territory were considered US citizens and were counted in the census.
In the 1860 Federal Census, non-Indian residents of Indian Territory
were listed as residents of the "Country West of the State of Arkansas."
You
can browse the 1860 Federal Census records online at Ancestry.com.
These records are listed within "Arkansas," county name "Indian Lands."
The
late 19th century is considered the "golden age" of the Cherokee Nation. It's
easy to see why. The Cherokees had built for themselves a constitutional government,
court system, and even a prison. The Cherokee Nation excelled at education,
in fact, the Cherokee Female Seminary was the first school west of the Mississippi
dedicated to the education of women. And it was at this time that the Cherokee
even had their own census. The 1880 Cherokee Nation Census lists all
Cherokees living within the boundaries of the Cherokee Nation.
There
is a partial listing of the 1880 Cherokee Nation Census available
for free online at Access
Genealogy. You can browse the list by district and surname.
The
1900 Federal Census was the first and last time that all citizens and
residents of Cherokee Nation, Indian Territory, were counted in the federal
census. By the next census, in 1910, Indian Territory was dissolved into the
new state of Oklahoma.
You
can browse the 1900 Federal Census records online at Ancestry.com.
These records are listed within the "Indian Territory" region.
Now, with information gleaned from the census
records and other primary source-documents you will have a clearer picture of
how your family history figures into Cherokee history. Did your ancestors live
in Oklahoma, or Indian Territory? If yes, then you would do best to focus on
those rolls taken of the Cherokee Nation. However, if your family lived in North
Carolina (or eastern Tennessee) they might be found on the Eastern Band of Cherokee
Indians rolls.
Most who start a search for their Cherokee ancestors
have their hopes set on tribal citizenship. Unfortunately, the vast majority
of people researching Cherokee ancestry will find that tribal citizenship is
not based on Cherokee heritage alone. In fact, citizenship standards for the
federally-recognized tribes are each unique, wholly-independent, and rigid.
The largest of the Cherokee tribes, the Cherokee
Nation now has over 200,000 tribal citizens. Headquartered in Tahlequah, Oklahoma,
the Nation covers a fourteen county region of the northeastern Oklahoma. The
tribe was disbanded in the early 20th century with the Dawes Roll, the "final"
roll of the Cherokee Nation. Those people who signed the Dawes Rolls were certified
as the citizens of the Cherokee Nation at its close and were allotted land.
In 1975, when the tribe reformed they turned to the Dawes Roll for their citizenship
requirements. The Dawes Roll, being the last legal record of Cherokee Nation
citizenship, became the basis for all future citizenship.
In order to be a citizen of the Cherokee Nation
you must prove that you are directly descended from someone registered on the
Dawes Roll as "Cherokee by blood."
If you found your ancestor's name listed on
the Dawes Roll results above then there
is a chance that you meet the requirements for becoming a citizen of the Cherokee
Nation. First, you need to request a copy of the full Dawes Commission file
for further clarification and confirmation. The Dawes Roll includes the following
data points for each enrollee:
- Name
- Relation
to head of family
- Age
- Gender
- Degree
of Indian blood
- Enrollment
year, district, and number
- Name
of father, enrollment year, and district
- Name
of mother, enrollment year, and district
You
can obtain the full Dawes Roll file from the National
Archives in either Washington, DC, or Fort Worth, Texas.
National
Archives and Records Administration
700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20408
Phone: 866-325-7208
E-mail
501
West Felix Street, Building 1
Fort Worth, Texas 76115-3405
P.O.
6216
Fort Worth, Texas 76115-0216
Phone: 817-334-5515
Fax: 817-334-5511
E-mail
Now, with a copy of the Dawes Commission file,
you will need to prove that you are a direct descendant from the individual.
To do this you must use primary source documents, as mentioned before. Once
you have the ancestry line documented, you will be able to apply for a Certificate
of Degree of Indian Blood (CDIB) and Cherokee Nation tribal citizenship.
The CDIB, also known as the "white card," is
issued by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA) through the Cherokee Nation and
is official recognition of your tribal affiliation as well as your degree of
Indian blood (blood quantum) based on the blood quantum stated by your ancestor
on the Dawes Roll. Tribal citizenship (blue card) certifies you as a citizen
of the Cherokee Nation and makes you eligible to vote in tribal elections.
To
make a formal application for Cherokee Nation tribal citizenship and the
CDIB you will need to contact the Cherokee
Nation Tribal Registration Office.
Cherokee
Nation of Oklahoma
P.O. Box 948
Tahlequah, OK 74465
Phone: (918) 456-0671
Fax: (918) 456-6485
Keep in mind that of the estimated 100,000 eligible
Cherokees, only about 41,500 actually enrolled on the Dawes Roll. It's entirely
possible that you are descended from a Cherokee who was living within the boundaries
of the Cherokee Nation, but who was not enrolled. Unfortunately there is little
consolation. Enrollment in the existing Cherokee Nation is not possible without
a Dawes Roll ancestor. Ironically, it was some of the most traditional Cherokees
who were not listed, and today their descendents remain outside of the Cherokee
Nation.
If your ancestors were living outside the boundaries
of the Cherokee Nation at the time of the Dawes Rolls, then they were considered
legal citizens of the US and therefore could not also be citizens of the Cherokee
Nation. Cherokees who relocated to Arkansas, Kansas, Missouri, Texas, and other
states were not eligible for enrollment and likewise their descendants today
are not eligible to become citizens of the Cherokee Nation, even if they are
able to prove their Cherokee lineage.
The Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians counts
over 12,500 members and is headquartered in the Quallah Boundary, a reservation
in North Carolina. Like the Cherokee Nation, the Eastern Band also uses their
"final roll" as criteria for tribal enrollment; however, the Eastern Band also
requires a minimum blood quantum.
In order to become a citizen of the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians you must prove that you are directly descended from
someone registered on the Bakers Roll and that your Eastern Cherokee blood quantum
is 1/16th or greater.
If you found your ancestor's name listed on
the Baker Roll results above then there is a
possibility that you meet the requirements for becoming a citizen of the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians. First, you need to request a copy of the full Baker
Roll file for further clarification and confirmation. The Baker Roll includes
the following data points for each enrollee:
- Name
- Relation
to head of family
- Age
- Gender
- Degree
of Indian blood
- Date
of birth
- City
and state
- Previous
roll numbers
- Additional
remarks
You
can obtain the full Baker Roll file from the National
Archives in either Washington, DC.
National
Archives and Records Administration
700 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20408
Phone: 866-325-7208
E-mail
With a copy of the Baker Roll file, you will
need to prove that you are a direct descendant from the individual. To do this
you must use primary source documents, as mentioned before. If you are able
to document a direct ancestral link then you've met one of the requirements
for tribal citizenship. Now you will need to calculate your blood quantum to
see if you meet the second requirement.
To calculate your blood quantum, look at your
ancestor's blood quantum field on the Baker roll. You will need to start with
your ancestor's quantum and work down to yourself -- algebra rears its ugly
head.
Hypothetically, say your grandfather is on the
Baker Roll with a blood quantum of 4/4 (full-blood) and your grandmother is
also listed on the Baker Roll with a blood quantum of 4/4, and your parents
are both full-blood -- then it's easy: you are a full-blood too. But for mixed-bloods
it's not so easy. Let's say your grandfather is 1/2 Eastern Band Cherokee and
he marries a non-Cherokee -- then his daughter, your mother, would be 1/4 Eastern
Band Cherokee. Now, your mother marries a man who is 1/8 Cherokee -- this makes
you 3/16 Cherokee. Confused yet?
It's actually fairly straightforward if you
just remember a few rules about fractions and then throw them all out, because
with quantum it's a little bit different. First, remember that the two denominators
(the bottom numbers) must be equal. So in the example above, the equation 1/4
+ 1/8 would actually need to be written 2/8 + 1/8 (2/8 is mathematically equivalent
to 1/4). Now, simply add the top numbers together. But here is where it gets
strange -- in a normal fraction calculation you would add only the top two numbers,
but with quantum you add both numbers, top and bottom. So here we would arrive
at the number 3/16.
Why? Well, with quantum you should consider
the fractions as parts. So in the case of the mother who is 2/8 Cherokee, she
is 2 out of 8 parts Cherokee. The father is 1 out of 8 parts Cherokee. Through
their union, a child is born who has now inherited eight parts from his mother
and eight parts from his father for a total of sixteen parts, and three of these
sixteen parts are Cherokee. Sounds weird, I know, but that's how the math works.
So, let's try it with some bigger numbers: one
ancestor is 1/16 and the other is 1/4 (for this equation 1/4 will be represented
as 4/16). Now, we add the numbers together and have a Cherokee with 5/32 blood
quantum. But what does this mean in terms of the 1/16 minimum requirement? Actually,
this person meets the minimum requirement. Why? One-sixteenth is mathematically
equal to 2/32, so a person with 5/32 quantum exceeds the minimum 1/16 requirement.
Here are a few more examples:
- A
one-sixteenth [1/16] Cherokee marries a full-blood [16/16] Cherokee, their
child would be 17/32 Cherokee. 1/16 + 16/16 = 17/32
- A
one-eighth [1/8] Cherokee marries a one-eighth [1/8] Cherokee, their child
would also be 1/8 Cherokee. 1/8 + 1/8 = 2/16 which equals 1/8.
- A
one-sixteenth [1/16] Cherokee marries a one-sixteenth [1/16] Creek, their
child would be 1/16 Indian (1/32 Cherokee and 1/32 Creek). However, this person
would not meet the minimum blood quantum requirement for joining the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians.
When
calculating blood quantum I recommend a pencil with a good eraser, a calculator,
and a healthy dose of patience, because it can be frustrating and the results
may not be what you were hoping to find.
So,
if you have the proven link to a direct ancestor on the Baker Rolls, and if
you meet the blood quantum required, then it's time to apply for tribal citizenship.
For
more information on enrollment, contact the Eastern
Band of Cherokee Indians Enrollment Info.
The
Eastern Band of Cherokees
Qualla Boundary
P.O. Box 455
Cherokee, NC 28719
Phone: (207) 497-2771 ask for the Tribal Enrollment Office
Fax: (704) 497-2952
Keep in mind that in 1924 the Eastern Band of
Cherokee Indians was relatively small and close knit, so it is unlikely that
you will uncover a long lost connection to this band. It's not out of the realm
of possibility, but you should approach your search with realistic expectations.
If you find that you are descended from someone
on the Baker Rolls but your blood quantum prevents you from joining, consider
that at least you have the much-coveted proof so many seek. Though your quantum
may not be enough to join the Eastern Band, it doesn't prevent you from cultivating
Cherokee culture and history in yourself and your family.
Did you know that there are three Cherokee tribes
recognized by the federal government? The first two, the Cherokee Nation and
the Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians, have already been covered at length in
this report. The third, or actually second in terms of chronology of federal
status, is the United Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians (UKB). The UKB was
organized under the Indian Reorganization Act of 1934 and the Oklahoma Indian
Welfare Act of 1936. Citizenship requires a blood quantum of 1/4 or higher and
is limited to persons on the list of members identified by a resolution dated
April 19, 1949, and their descendants.
To
learn more about the UKB you can contact the tribe at:
United
Keetoowah Band of Cherokee Indians in Oklahoma
P.O. Box 746, Tahlequah, OK 74465-0746
Phone: (918) 456-5491
FAX: (918) 456-9601
If your ancestors were living in Indian Territory
or the Qualla Boundary and you know that they were Cherokee, then consider checking
for other family names on these two rolls. Perhaps it was your great grandmother,
and not your great grandfather (as your family had always believed), who was
Cherokee. Exhaust all possibilities in your family tree.
Unfortunately, there were a number of Cherokee
who moved away from the Cherokee lands. After repeated broken treaties and rolls,
some Cherokee were fed up with it all. Some groups moved as far as they could
from the US government -- to Mexico -- while others gave up their Cherokee citizenship
and moved into the US. Those Cherokee who left the Cherokee Nation or the Eastern
reservation would lose their citizenship and no longer be counted in the rolls.
If your family lived in Texas, Indiana, Missouri, or many other locations outside
of the two main boundaries, then you will likely find it difficult to trace
your family to the later rolls. Since tribal citizenship in the Cherokee Nation
and Eastern Band of Cherokee Indians is based on enrollment in the Dawes and
Bakers Rolls, it's likely you will not be able to qualify for tribal citizenship.
However, because of the ongoing Cherokee diaspora
it's important to look for ancestors on all of the rolls, not just the two "final
rolls." It's very possible, and somewhat common that an individual can trace
his or her family heritage back to one of the older rolls, but not the two rolls
used as the basis for tribal enrollment. So don't overlook the earlier rolls.
They won't provide an opportunity for enrollment in the tribes, but they are
legal "proof" just the same.
Welcome to the 21st century. It's like a bad
sci-fi movie where genealogy no longer refers to ancestors but instead to chromosomes.
Call me old fashioned, but where's the fun in that? I thought genealogy was
supposed to be about learning the story of your family, not genetically assigning
an ethnicity to your chromosomal make-up.
But enough of my editorializing. The reality
is, even if we wanted to find our "proof" in our DNA, we can't -- at least not
yet. It's true that there have been studies into the "Native American" DNA genetic
markers. Scientists believe that if a person has these genetic markers in their
DNA he or she is probably Native American. But the keyword here is "probably."
Why? Well it's not an exact science. There are
two ways to test for Native American heritage in DNA -- mitochondrial DNA and
the Y-chromosome. Mitochondrial DNA is passed through a continuous matrilineal
line (e.g. mother's-mother's-mother's). So, if you are a mixed-blood and your
Cherokee heritage came from your mother's father, then you will test negative
for the Native American gene. The other testing method, Y-chromosome, also suffers
from this problem. Since women do not have a Y-chromosome this test will only
come up positive if you are male and your Native American ancestry was passed
to you, unbroken, through a male line in your family. And, even if you test
positive, it's still not conclusive proof, as it turns out that the "Native
American" genetic markers are often also present in some ethnic groups in Asia,
southern Europe, and the Pacific Islands.
Even if your DNA tests positive for Native American
heritage this will still not be enough for citizenship in any recognized Indian
tribe. The DNA tests cannot differentiate between tribes. So there is no way
to conclusively prove that you are "Cherokee." In addition, and most importantly,
tribal citizenship is not based on genetics. It is based on family history.
The best we can hope for is that genetic technology
will eventually work with genealogy to give us a full understanding of where
we come from. At Brigham Young University a study is underway to try and create
a genetically based world family tree that will link everyone together based
on our DNA. This could aid genealogists in finding conclusive connections between
generations -- a sort of hybrid science-history. Using both history and science
to know our ancestors is likely to be the future of genealogy.
Yes and no. Remember that there are only three
federally-recognized Cherokee tribes. However, there are several state-recognized
Cherokee groups, which are only recognized in their respective states. If one
of these groups is in your state, you'll need to contact them about their membership
policies.
In addition, there are also countless other
non-recognized groups that claim Cherokee roots. More often than not these groups
are heritage societies and social clubs with Cherokee cultural connections that
are worthwhile to explore (they often share traditions, recipes, genealogy information
and tons more great information).
Unfortunately, there are also a number of less
reputable groups. Be wary of any group calling itself a "tribe" that charges
a fee to join or asks for donations. Do your research before joining any group.
Read their website and literature, ask around, find out what they are about
-- know what you are joining before you sign your name to anything. Additionally,
the so-called "Native American ID cards," which are issued for a modest fee,
are not legitimate and carry no real meaning. It's sad that we should have to
operate on this level of suspicion and mistrust, but it will be necessary as
long as people continue to exploit the Cherokee name.
I sincerely hope this report will help lead
you to the ancestors and the "proof" of Cherokee ancestry you seek. Unfortunately,
finding conclusive proof is often an elusive goal. You may find that you are
one of the many Cherokees who are ineligible to join one of the three federally-recognized
Cherokee tribes. Don't let that hamper your enthusiasm for Cherokee culture
and history. What matters most is who you know you are - not what you can prove
to others. Be proud of your Cherokee heritage, proven or not.
|